Nigerian man breaks down in tears after discovering 32-year-old ‘son’ isn’t his child .

Nigerian man breaks down in tears after discovering 32-year-old ‘son’ isn’t his child .
.
A middle aged Nigerian man has discovered that a young man he raised from birth and who is now 32 years old is not his biological son, after all. .
.
The Nigerian man who resides in the United Kingdom, Mr. Oscar, was forced to arrange for a DNA test to determine the paternity of his erstwhile son, Valentine, when his wife allegedly told their presumed son that Oscar was not likely to be Valentine’s biological father. .
.
Valentine had dragged his supposed dad, Oscar, to a DNA test centre in Britain after his mother informed him a month ago that the man who had brought him up for the last 32 years may not actually be his dad. .
.
As a doting father, Oscar had brought Valentine to England from Nigeria and put him through school. When the result of the DNA test was read to him, Oscar wailed in agony as the results said there was “no per cent chance” he and Valentine were father and son. .
.
Oscar wailed in despair as he asked: “He’s not my son?” Valentine was speechless. Crdt: Mirror UK

EDO GOVERNORSHIP PETITION TRIBUNAL UPDATE

EDO GOVERNORSHIP PETITION TRIBUNAL UPDATE~

Today-14/02/2017.

Since it was time for INEC to commence their defense, Counsel to INEC Oyinye Anuwonye started by complaining that they are bedeviled with so much challenges.

First of which is that their senior counsel is not available, secondly they complained about logistical problems of conveying INEC staff not stationed in Benin City, inability to reach NYSC members who have all passed out from Edo State, also that some others who were sent text messages didn't respond.

Furthermore, he said that in order to defend their case he is asking for the court to adjourn till Friday, so that they can have more time to reach out, interact and prepare their witnesses for an effective defense.

Responding, the chairman of the tribunal Ahmed Gbadamosi admonished the INEC counsel to have been prepared adequately before hand.

The counsel to PDP objected to the 1st respondent's application while the counsel's to the 2nd and 3rd respondents supported the 1st respondent's application.

In the judges' ruling, he said its statutory the 1st respondent (INEC) starts today, so it will not be out of place to grant them their application to loss 3 days from their 10 days since it's still within their timeframe, he finally adjourned sitting till Friday 17th February 2017.